|
Beginning in the 1999-2000 school
year, a student who wishes to complete an advanced high school
program in theatre (called the Distinguished Achievement Program)
and have the accomplishment recognized and distinguished on
the academic achievement record (transcript)
must take the courses outlined in Texas Administrative Code,
Chapter 74.13, and must achieve any combination of four of
the following advanced measures. Original research/projects
in theatre may not be used for more than two of the four measures.
The measures focus on demonstrated student performance at
an outstanding level. Student performance on advanced measures
must be assessed through an external review process. The advanced
measures are as follows:
Original research/project
that is:
- Judged by
a panel of professionals in the theatre field that is the
focus of the project; or
- Conducted
under the direction of mentor(s) and reported to an appropriate
audience; and
- Related to
the theatre curriculum set forth in 19 TAC §74.1 (relating
to the Theatre Essential Knowledge and Skills);
Test data where
a student receives:
- A score of
three or above on a College Board Advanced Placement examination;
- A score of
four or above on an International Baccalaureate examination;
or
- A score on
the Preliminary Scholastic Assessment Test (PSAT) that qualifies
a student for recognition as a Commended Scholar or higher
by the National Merit Scholarship Corporation; as part of
the National Hispanic Scholar Program of The College Board;
or as part of the National Achievement Scholarship Program
for Outstanding Negro Students of the National Merit Scholarship
Corporation. The PSAT may count as only one advanced measure
regardless of the number of honors received by the student;
or
College courses
in which a student receives:
- A grade of 3.0 or higher on
courses that count for one college credit, including tech-prep
programs.
For original research/projects,
students design proposals independently, conduct in-depth
research, prepare performances and/or findings of high quality,
and present their work in formal presentations and performances
for evaluation by a pre-designated panel of experts in the
project's field. The components of projects include the four
strands of the Theatre TEKS. Students are encouraged to work
with mentors who are recognized experts in the field of the
project. The project proposal, which must be approved by the
teacher of record at the outset of the project, is a detailed
plan which:
- Describes the scope, goals,
and expectations of the project
- Establishes a reasonable timeline
for completion
- Identifies strategies for
achieving project objectives
- Identifies project resources
including people to be interviewed, materials, and research
centers
- Establishes criteria for selecting
an expert panel to evaluate the formal presentation and
performance
- Establishes the assessment
criteria to be used by the panel and teacher of record in
the evaluation of the final performance and presentation
- Establishes criteria for mentor(s),
including brief biographical sketches of proposed mentor(s).
DAP participants in theatre demonstrate
original thought, communicate expressively and insightfully,
and show college or professional-level technical skills and
knowledge. An original play must be produced in a form that
can be replicated by others. The research component of the
project should be documented in a journal and/or production
book. Highlights of the research are shared with the audience
and panel of experts during the final presentation. Research
may include resources such as:
- Materials of historical and
cultural relevance
- Contributions of distinguished
theatrical performers, directors, or technicians from the
past and present
- Collections, documents, exhibits,
and lectures pertaining to the project
- Personal interviews
- Live and recorded performances
- Surveys, experiments, and
case studies.
Self-reflection and assessment
of the project by the student is as important as the formal
evaluation by the panel of experts. The student, teacher of
record, and mentor should practice continuous assessment of
the project at designated intervals and following the formal
presentation. Progress should be evaluated in journals or
production books. Students practice self-evaluation, analysis
of information, synthesis of findings, and justification of
conclusions. Students should make recommendations for future
work and suggestions for other DAP participants. It is crucial
that evaluations by the panel of experts are based on the
criteria defined in the project proposal and that criteria
provide opportunities for discussion following the formal
presentation.
The project is complete when
all components of the contract have been fulfilled, the work
has been evaluated and accepted, the recommendation has been
made to award a distinguished achievement measure, and the
teacher of record has awarded a grade.
|