|
A
number of ways exist for theatre teachers to participate in
on-going, meaningful professional development based on the
five models of professional development proposed by Sparks
and Loucks-Horsley in 1990. Training, traditionally the most
common professional development approach, is just one of the
five models. Four alternative models are suggested to supplement
training and to help teachers and administrators acquire important
job-related knowledge and skills in the theatre. All five
strategies are outlined below.
Inquiry
In
this model, teachers pursue questions of professional interest,
either individually or in small groups, related to their own
teaching practices. The process of inquiry can take a number
of forms. In the action research model, teachers
identify a problem, collect data from research or classroom-based
action research, analyze the data, and come to a conclusion
about the best course of action to enhance student learning.
The teacher may continue the inquiry process by collecting
and analyzing data after the new course of action is implemented.
Another form of inquiry is the study group, or reading
group,in which colleagues explore and share new
ideas to enhance student learning. This model is based on
the assumption that one quality of professional educators
is their ability to take reflective action.
Involvement
in a development/improvement process
Working
to solve a problem, or a series of problems, is an excellent
way to learn new skills, attitudes, and behaviors. The process
of systemic school improvement can mobilize
teachers to assess current practices and determine solutions
to challenges that may impede students' acquisition of the
Theatre TEKS. Also, working at the district level to develop
curriculum aligned with the Theatre TEKS can be a
powerful professional development experience. Many theatre
teachers value these opportunities to work collaboratively
with colleagues to solve problems or produce products that
will enhance learning beyond the teachers immediate
classroom.
Observation/assessment
This
model is based on the use of external evaluation
as a tool for self-analysis and reflection. Colleagues or
other personnel act as eyes and ears for theatre teachers.
They observe and provide feedback on instructional practices,
classroom management, and other issues. One tool is the use
of videotape, allowing a teacher to observe
himself or herself in action. Watching the videotape with
a colleague, looking for evidence of the TEKS, as demonstrated
by students, and looking for effective techniques of teaching
the TEKS can be an enlightening experience. Many teachers
comment on the power of video in helping them improve their
teaching practices.
Individually-guided
staff development
In
this alternative model, each theatre teacher designs his or
her own learning activities with the primary goal of enhancing
student acquisition of the Theatre TEKS. Teachers may do a
self-assessment of their own knowledge and
understanding of the TEKS to identify areas they need to study
to successfully teach the state standards. Then the teacher,
possibly in collaboration with colleagues and/or administrators,
sets goals, identifies strategies for achieving goals,
and sets benchmarks to evaluate learning along the way.
This model is based on the assumption that individuals are
motivated by selecting their own learning goals and means
of accomplishing the goals. It also assumes that self-directed
development empowers teachers and creates a sense of professionalism.
Training
In
this model, an expert presenter, who may be a classroom teacher,
aligns objectives and learning activities and monitors participants
learning. The goals for staff development training typically
include awareness, knowledge, and skill development.
Trainers also foster outcomes related to changes in attitude
and transfer of training. Effective training programs include:
- exploration
of theory
- demonstration
of practice
- supervised
trial of new skills with feedback on performance
- peer
coaching beyond the context of the workshop.
|